![]() ![]() ![]() If Taken 2 had merely been exactly what it looks like - a carbon-copy retread of 2008's Taken, the film with which Liam Neeson ushered in his very unexpected late-career reinvention as a savagely effective action star - that would have already raised its share of questions, like "okay, why?" Not that studios ever both to ask the question, for they are not encouraged to do so by the enthusiasm of fans, but I like to think that there needs to be some active reason to watch a sequel, something that makes it different enough that one has some motive not to just re-watch the original.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |